From Planning to Dispute—
One Defensible Project Record
Most firms separate planning, delivery, and dispute. PSC integrates them into one defensible record.
Five Years. Zero Adverse Findings.
Every arbitration. Every tribunal. PSC's position prevailed.
Five globally ranked dispute resolution firms attempted to acquire this capability. PSC declined.
Most Projects Don't Fail in Execution.
They Fail When the Record Can't Be Defended.
The schedule says one thing. The site is doing another. The real decisions happen somewhere else.
The schedule shows progress — but procurement is already slipping
Change orders are approved — but entitlement is undocumented
Delays are discussed — but not formally noticed
One System Across Three Phases
Most firms operate in one phase. PSC operates across the system.
Planning & Controls
Build and manage the schedule that governs the work
The schedulers and systems that keep your program on track.
Planning & Controls services →Delivery & Governance
Your eyes and ears on the project — from design to substantial completion
Whether $10M or $10B — PSC manages the project, not just the paperwork.
Delivery & Governance services →Forensic & Dispute Resolution
Reconstruct and defend what actually happened
Positions that hold under scrutiny.
Forensic & Dispute services →Early intervention determines the outcome.
Request ConsultationWhen Controls Lie, Projects Drift.
Projects don't fail because data is missing. They fail because:
Decisions are not traceable
Models are not updated
The record cannot support the outcome
PSC eliminates that gap.
Outcomes That Hold Under Scrutiny
Infrastructure · Data Centers · Healthcare · Commercial Development
Hyperscale Data Center — Electrical & Controls
Contractor delivered all scope, received full payment for direct costs, and recovered $0 in time-related damages. Standard accounting showed nominal profit. Forensic analysis revealed $4.7M in uncompensated exposure across labor escalation, opportunity cost, and extended overhead.
Governance gap: no contemporaneous documentation at six decision points.
Your current reporting would not have caught this either.
Hyperscale Data Center — Critical Systems Commissioning
Scope expansion and design decision delays extended performance by 10 months. Contractor's A-team was locked, B-team deployed to concurrent project resulted in performance issues and lost follow-on work.
Governance gap: no formal notice protocol, no opportunity cost quantification.
The P&L showed margin. The actual position was a $2.58M loss.
Who We Work With
Owners & Developers
Construction management, owner's representation, and governance systems — from project award through dispute.
Owner services →Contractors
CPM scheduling, progress tracking, and positions built during execution — not reconstructed in dispute.
Contractor services →Law Firms
Forensic analysis grounded in the project record — not hindsight.
Dispute resolution services →Engage PSC When:
The schedule and reality are diverging
Decisions are not clearly documented
A claim is forming
A dispute is emerging
Your program needs dedicated scheduling and controls support
You need an owner's representative for a federal or complex capital project
The project position is no longer clear